Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (23856)	8/11/1998 7:08:00 AM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Gersh: Interesting, 90 huh? That is one of the numbers I use in my own NEY MACDX_OSC. Numbers crunched years ago. (eighties) <g> BWDIK Regards, LG

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (23856)	8/11/1998 7:57:00 AM
From: Monty Lenard	Respond to of 94695

Hi Gersh, I agree on having to change MA's. I have used the 40, 50, 65, and on and on. The difference is that Jim is looking for is the LIES that are being told by Mr. Market. I think any MA will tell you that you are being told a LIE just that the shorter MA's (for what we are doing) tell you a LITTLE QUICKER. To me this is much different that depending on a CERTAIN MA to show you support or resistance as the shorter ones DEPENDABILITY does change from time to time. The thing that I really like about using Excel is that I am now REALLY SEEING the changes rather that just flipping through charts and LOOKING at them. Don't get me wrong I would never trade my charts for Excel, I just think that this analysis helps clear the smoke somewhat. Monty