SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MikeM54321 who wrote (5433)8/11/1998 8:06:00 AM
From: Defrocked  Respond to of 9980
 
Excellent point, 54321. The Chinese are usually very
quite about private dealings....why would an "unnamed"
official choose to publicize such a sensitive transaction
now???(Could it be geopolitics??<g>)



To: MikeM54321 who wrote (5433)8/11/1998 8:39:00 AM
From: Ron Bower  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9980
 
Mike,

Why should China, with limited foreign reserves, hold yen when Japan, with their large amount of foreign reserves, is unwilling to buy to support the value?

It is Japan's responsibility, not the US, and not China that needs the foreign reserves to protect the RMB - and, unlike Japan, they have been buying - to the frustration of the traders.

FWIW,
Ron



To: MikeM54321 who wrote (5433)8/11/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: Michael Sphar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9980
 
Good poker playing indeed! Wasn't it Rubin that dumped a couple billion US dollars to temporarily drive the yen down to 137 just before the Clinton junket to PRC where he waffled on the issue of Taiwan ?

Perhaps they just wanted to give the Japanese a chance to take a longside bet on the rising sun of China.