Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Alliance Pacific Gold Corp, V.APG (formerly Yukon Gold -V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Slim who wrote (187)	8/11/1998 7:35:00 PM
From: K. Anders	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209

Why are you voting 'no'? Do you want the company to go into default, get halted and fall off the board, whatever is left of your investment with it? You all should seriously re-consider your positions. Voting no on the proxy will hurt the company and whatever chance you have to make some of your money back. Why don't we all look at the potential opportunity here. Look, when a company gets rolled back, the insiders give the loyal investors a chance to invest at dirt cheap prices, pre-work programs and pre-PROMOTION! I own shares in this company and, having spoken to their IR/geologist guys, I am probably going to take part in the initial financing if the stock gets rolled back. Believe me, insiders will be buying whatever cheap stock they are allowed by the exchange because they know the value in it. If we are given a chance to take part, which I understand we will be, with a low stock float, new financing, continued work programs, and promotion not having even started yet, we are looking at a fresh new company ready to roll. I think we should be voting 'yes' to a roll back. It is the most logical move. Karl