SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Phoenix who wrote (15932)8/11/1998 10:35:00 AM
From: Sawtooth  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 77400
 
Just for the sake of discussion, most on the CSCO and LU (and ASND, ...) threads are assuming that LU will do a major acquisition in the data area come October. Maybe not.

LU to-date has largely emulated CSCO's approach to making very selective and relatively small acquisitions of key technologies. I think I remember McGinn of LU saying not too long ago that if they were interested in buying a company, they would buy it. LU isn't exactly strapped for cash.

I think it's generally agreed that, all other things being equal, the migration from voice switching (telecomm) to data switching (networking) is technically "easier" than the reverse.

So, is it so far fetched that LU will proceed as they have in the past and not do The Biggy in Oct.?

Looking forward to other's perspectives. ...Tim



To: The Phoenix who wrote (15932)8/11/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: djane  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77400
 
Gary, thanks for your rational, considered response (as usual). CSCO, ASND, LU and NT/BAY are very well-positioned for the data/voice and internet infrastructure build-out. The narrow, CSCO-only boosters are missing the big picture.



To: The Phoenix who wrote (15932)8/11/1998 11:03:00 AM
From: The Phoenix  Respond to of 77400
 
Cisco moves on to the FRONTIER..

biz.yahoo.com



To: The Phoenix who wrote (15932)8/11/1998 3:28:00 PM
From: StockMan  Respond to of 77400
 
Dude,
Re -- I think it's probably easier to bring in old stodgy technology and adapt it to new world thinking.

Once again RUBBISH...

Stockman