SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (35817)8/11/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1573268
 
If Intel has a bunch of Celeron As, why aren't they selling them?
There are reasons why the 350 K6-2s haven't been released yet. More reasons than just yield.
Of course you don't believe this. Why don't you sell your AMD stock...
Jim



To: Paul Engel who wrote (35817)8/11/1998 3:50:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1573268
 
Engel,
This ones for you man! <G>
geocities.com
Intel on the run!
Jim



To: Paul Engel who wrote (35817)8/12/1998 7:45:00 AM
From: Dave  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573268
 
Paul/Yousef:

I remember Paul stated that he received the "double secret AMD yield email". While the contents of the email were never posted on SI, was AMD on a .35 process or a .25 process? Another question, did the this email state the growth in yield, or yield percentages? As I recall, AMD's 3Q production of K6/K6-x's almost doubled, but that was due to the .25 process; therefore, where were the supposed "yields" increased?

Thanks,

dave