Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rjbac who wrote (12204)	8/11/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: Mike Cancade	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Why doesn't someone else call Sabrina and confirm what she told me? Am I wrong...Guido did 1800 samples? She said BD would do slightly less maybe around 1000 in her judgement. Why would GE bring in BD for anything less than a full scale operation in this environment they are in? If this is so, then it may end up being just another study that is not conclusive. In other words, after they are finished are we going to be sitting here and still debating how much gold there really is, and then wait some more for more verification? Please someone else call GE and see how much info you can get!. When I called it was only 3 days after the BD news.

To: rjbac who wrote (12204)	8/11/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: toma	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

actually, statistically speaking 1000 samples could provide excellent information regarding the potential of the deposit. it is nearly impossible to "define" or "verify" the actual ozs in any deposit because even in collecting 50,000 samples you are only sampling a very very small fraction of the population. if they manage to come close to defining the variability of gold in the formation beneath their property - that is new samples collected have very little impact on the variability of the data set. they can provide a mean concentration (probably geometric - most natural system are gerometrically distributed, and this one appears to be the same) and a range of the possible total mass of ore. this range would be defined using a t-statistic at a certain confidence level, and would be stated something like we are 95% confident that the mass of ore in the deposit is between x and y ozs. is it likely? again who knows - depends on how well the samples cover the range of possible samples in the formation (picture this as a bell curve - you want to grab a piece from all portions of the curve, and hopefully represent the middle more than the edges); but, 1000 samples collected at widely distributed locations WILL definitely, give a better idea of how much is there. toma