SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JF2155 who wrote (37258)8/11/1998 2:58:00 PM
From: DavidG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Jim,

I wonder if the probability is greater that zero that Skeeter might say no? :-)

You have to know who to ask your questions, to make sure you get the answer you are looking for. <ggg>

You may have to broaden your scope a little and then maybe you will get some answers as to why MU ALSO goes up AS WELL AS down.<vbg>

DavidG



To: JF2155 who wrote (37258)8/11/1998 5:53:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Jim, I know you asked Skeets, but 100,000 64 Mbit Rambus chips a month now and 1.000,000 sometime next year doesn't sound good for MU. Somebody forgot to tell Samsung that they were going out of business. <G>

MB



To: JF2155 who wrote (37258)8/11/1998 9:06:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 53903
 
jf, no. it is just another area where everyone will pile on with capacity and drive the prices down to where everyone is still losing money. bad news for all is capacity problems.

i did notice they were 64 mb chips, though. the ante goes up again...