SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ausdauer who wrote (3590)8/11/1998 6:51:00 PM
From: Tom Gebing  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Ausdauer, I agree the Asia factor was a big part of why the stock dropped from the mid twenties, but the suit was the bomb that sent the stock below technical support of 19. If you recall last earnings report, Asia was old, but continued news. The lack of visibility for royalties and the direct mention of the suit is what I believe made the stock lose any hope of recovery . Now at 9 3/4.. and with digital camera market getting stronger by the week - A normal stock in this situation would trade on forward expectations. If Lexar won or wins the suit , then Sandisk has no backbone to its future, like Rambus enjoys with its RDRAM technology. The Asia crisis has more to do with gross margin then with unit sales. If Sandisk has no royalties or fees to offset the lower GM then the company suffers. Thus , the stock price. I think this is where we are at now in everyone's thinking. The royalty opportunity and or licensing fee receipts is what keeps this company from being another commodity business, which has no chance to compete against the Asian companies . Royalties and licensing fees is what we are all here for. Lexar is a direct threat to the future of what will make this company be a leader in the industry. If they get away with it, then why would any other company pay Sandisk for the patent use. This concept is what I believe has hurt the stock the most. With today's news, we may have gotten a little light in the tunnel. But no guarantee.... I agree with you - refreshing but cautioun is still needed.

To All, just my opinion based on what I see is happening. Please come to your own conclusions.

Long and patient
Tom



To: Ausdauer who wrote (3590)8/11/1998 6:59:00 PM
From: Jason Rooks  Respond to of 60323
 
A little caution regarding the Lexar news. Reading much into the Court's denying a motion to dismiss is risky. Defendants always file motions to dismiss or for summary judgment. Clearly surviving an early motion is important, but it does not give any indications about the likelihood for ultimate success. As a lawyer, I interpret this news to mean the lawsuit was not meritless. It may mean the lawsuit has merit, but certainly not that the plaintiff, SNDK, will prevail. Further, it may have some impact on the settlement negotiations, but really it just means that the lawsuit will continue and the legal fees will increase. A positive resolution to the suit will be important to SNDK because it will mean more revenue and signal wallstreet of the strength of SNDK's intellectual property value.