Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (33661)	8/11/1998 10:56:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Charles, each of those companies are independent, have their own funding and officers. Sure, IPM lead the group down, that's the only connection. I hope that IPM can survive, but as Zeev has suggested, belly up for IPM may even be cathartic and clear the air for the remaining dirt's.

To: go4it who wrote (33661)	8/11/1998 11:00:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

This is getting us somewhere now. I posted what I heard yesterday, you posted what emailers were "saying a discourageing word at home on the range" ( and never to say a discourgaing word- home on the range); and Mazzarella, dissagrees to agree or some such verbage or nounage. The other way around - I am sure. But that is allright, at least my USPS is holding up fine for the last few months...ooops, what happened there? Chucaupt2 Chuca Chuc Chu Ch-ch-ch-now-get my name right, the play is Ch. ( Clorine and rinse out they whatevers with Clorine Bromine Bleaching Agent.)