Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Davis who wrote (6268)	8/11/1998 11:36:00 PM
From: Michael Graham	Respond to of 8879

Bob, You stated "The July 7th press release was headlined "Global Games Corp. Signs Preliminary Agreement With Commonwealth of Dominica, West Indies", when in fact, no such agreement had been reached." I believe that Mr. Timothy saying no agreement has been signed is like president Clinton saying he did not have sexual relations with Monica. Mr. Timothy did not say that no preliminary agreement had been signed. It may sound like a minor point, but remember that Mr. Timothy is a politician. I recently visited you web site and checked out what you had to say about GLOW and found this: "There are a limited number of reasons why an accounting firm is not able to complete an audit - and none of them are the result of "good news". In fact, many of the reasons revolve around whether the company being audited can be classified as a "going concern". You are categorically stating that a delay in an audit CAN'T be the result of "good news". That statement CAN'T be true! That is a very biased statement. I thought you were supposed to report facts? Did you call either GLOW or the accounting firm to find out why there is a delay? I'm not saying that it isn't questionable news or even bad news. I don't know the reason for the delay. However, I would not imply or insinuate that the reason for the delay is because GLOW is having significant business or financial problems. Unless, of course, I wanted others to believe that. Once again, how can you make statements like that and expect shareholders NOT to strenuously disagree with you and your slanted view? Unless you had proof, why would you state something so inflammatory? BTW - You expect GLOW to correct a "mis-statement", yet you refuse to admit or correct your own: >>>> If you do you will see a HTML link to the July 30th GLOW press release. Mr. Julius Timothy is specifically refuting GLOW's July 30th press release. I'm sorry but I had already looked at that specific issue before I ever made my first post. I specifically wanted to make sure exactly "what" Mr. Timothy was refuting. <<<< and >>>> Further, it fairly evident that the Commonwealth of Dominica is not expecting to receive $9,000,000 as its portion of the proceeds from the GLOW relationship. In fact, their expectations from their existing licensing agreements with the six internet casinos which are domaciled there is only EC$3,240,000, or about US$1.2 million in the coming year. Since the Commonwealth is planning a bond issue to raise about US$7.4 million for housing (yes, I actually read the local papers down there...) the sudden arrival of US$9.0 million would create a bit of excitement. Since that "excitement" has not been reported in the local press, it seems safe to assume that there is nothing here to get excited about. <<<< Everyone is fallible. Why do you refuse to admit making a mistake? It's not easy to do, however, it is the responsible thing to do. As my mother-in-law once said "I'm very disappointed in you." Mike

To: Bob Davis who wrote (6268)	8/12/1998 2:14:00 AM
From: MMpro	Respond to of 8879

Bob Davis, Minister Timothy's remarks about "IGC" and "Island Sports Book and Casino" IBCs seem to press home the point that those entities were just recently created AND owned by Gary Borglund. This effectively should end all speculation as to whether Island Sports Book has any "special" relationship with the Dominica Gov't. Also Minister Timothy's comment concerning the extra 5% fee the Gov't will receive due to GLOW being a "good corporate citizen" seems to me a little odd. Looks like GLOW had to up the ante to play with the big boys!! LOL! Peace Riccardo

To: Bob Davis who wrote (6268)	8/12/1998 2:15:00 AM
From: bodie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8879

<<< I would imagine that this market will become very competitive in the near future.>>>> Amazing, did anyone else catch this. Bobby, I'm surprised at you. You actually said something positive about GLOW, even if you didn't mean to. All this time I thought you didn't own any shares of GLOW, and you secretly knew that there was a lot of money to be made in the online gaming industry. After all why would you make the above statement, unless, wait, I know your answer, your going to say it was a Freudian slip, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, right? Its not like GLOW is making horse and buggy whips. Your changing your spin from GLOW is full of crap to GLOW is actually a business, who will be competing with other businesses. What will your 7000 readers think of you?