Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (12219)	8/12/1998 2:02:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop	Respond to of 34075

< If any third party comes out with a non-confirmation... then isn't the game over? > I'd agree, and I'd also say that nothing is going to happen without 3rd party other than just what has been happening for the last month.

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (12219)	8/12/1998 8:10:00 AM
From: Geita	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Dear Claude, Assuming any or all of the following statements are true, is there a possibility the 3rd party will come up with higher figures than Guido? Hav e you ever known this to happen? Would those new figures be accepted by the mining community? -and the overwhelming evidence of geologic continuity, it is my opinion that the portion of the Cangalli claims that I studied, which would have been in any event less than half of the claims under contract, contain an Indicated Resource of 60,771,704 troy ounces of gold and an Inferred Resource of 111,414,800 troy ounces of gold. -Paravicini used between 30% and 40% of the indicated cubic meterage as indicated by topographical data to ensure conservative calculations. -The lowest of the assays obtained was always used instead of the average. Thank you for your opinion. Bill Leahy