SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (35864)8/12/1998 7:02:00 AM
From: Michael DaKota  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573864
 
Very entertaining, Paul !...

1st time I have enjoyed reading a post of yours , paul !
Keep up the good work, and may al Cyrix fans be "trashed" ;))

Neh...I don't think cyrix is the right cpu at this moment, they run blood-hot, perform awefull with 3d and fpu intensive programs (no, not "a little less than intel,", just straight forward AWEFULL)and are hardly overclockable....Nonetheless I think Cyrix will have an advanced cpu q3 of 1999, the MXi or "cheyenne" . Featuring 3d-now (yes, sources inside Cyrix revealed Cyrix will use 3d-now in their future cpu's instead of KNI )the weakest spot of Cyrix will be removed (the gaming performance..), and be a serious competitor to both the Celeron and the K6-1 or 2. But at that time the K6-2+ and K6-3 should be available, and still would render the Cyrix rather useless for mid end computers. As for the Medicino (Majic TM), I think it is a good alternative for performance-hungry intel fans with a smaller budget. I even think people find the Medicino more value for money than the pII.

Greetz, Michael da Kota.

Ps., Paul, do you happen to know anything about Intel supporting 3d-now in the future ? Just as MMX it is going to be a standard, and KNI won't be out for a long time... And when MMX came out (althoug it was quite a farce) both AMD and Cyrix used it in their cpu's.

Or did AMD patented it better than Intel ? ("this cpu is MMX-capable" in stead of "with MMX",...remember AMD :p)

cyu.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (35864)8/12/1998 7:50:00 AM
From: Michael DaKota  Respond to of 1573864
 
More delays for the 450 MHz Xeon 4-way servers

news.com

Just wondering if Intel still makes *any* chance in the server end..

Why would high-end server administrators switch from reliable and fast alpha's, HP's and Sun cpu's to buggy and "multimedia-fitted" (mmx) cpu's from intel.....with shitty performance also...

Greetz, Michael da Kota FHWL