Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Binder who wrote (3497)	8/12/1998 3:23:00 AM
From: Dusty	Respond to of 7039

Anna, # 5 sounds good but I will pass on the company services. <<I take extreme personal offense to your implication and innuendo with comments about "long lunches", etc. You and Joe Copia are off base, wrong, and completely out of line with those comments.>>> This one you have stretched a little to far for your own good. I said you could enjoy company luncheons as a tax write of and that was a great deal. That is considered a company benefit even if the write off is only 20 percent. You, Anna, are reading something I did not say into my post. Why? Why would you want to publicly degrade yourself by suggest something obscene or immoral? I could give a rip less what you do in your personal life or who you do it with for that matter. Anna, I say exactly what I mean and if I were accusing anyone of lewd conduct I assure you I could do a much better job of it. It was you who brought up the toe sucking and so some of us are having a few laughs at your expense; you should have expected that when you posted the nonsense. However, teasing you is a far stretch from accusing anyone of immoral conduct. So back off and don't go there. I am sorry to hear of your husband's misfortune and would wish him well in his new career; just as I did you. I simply am not interested in, nor do I have any respect for anyone who promotes stocks for pay; I make no bones about it. In my opinion, a good company that is for real, does not need to be "profiled" or promoted by anyone. On the internet a good company who has shareholders will get the word out; like a flame raging through a gas factory. These days good start up companies are scarce and investors seek them out. I am very cautious of and do not visit web sites that promote stocks. I know they have been paid in stock and or cash for their services. The free shares are then sold into the market after the "promoting" has managed to increase the price of the stock; this is of course how they get cash to operate and live on. I am well aware of the facts and do not find the services of a promotional company to fit my personal needs. I further find it deplorable that anyone would want to make a living off of unskilled investors; it is a known fact that they are attracted to such sites. You were quick to point out that the company would not promote anything considered to be a scam; in so many words. But, human nature being what it is, especially in the internet arena, will most likely win out over lofty ideals. You are a talented and attractive young woman; I would think you could easily find employment that could utilize those talents without becoming a part of the internet sleaze; again JMHO, that and a buck will buy you a cup of coffee. Dusty

To: Binder who wrote (3497)	8/12/1998 3:49:00 AM
From: chickenLIPS	Respond to of 7039

Well I honestly hope that you keep posting.... I promise I will be good! .....heh heh heh... One of the things I have always noticed on all of GaBards E-mails, or postings is the phrase, "Do what is right for you, not based on what I have to say" (sorta paraphrased, but you know what I am talking about) This says it all..... If a person is influenced to such a degree that they make decisions based on someone else's word, DD or whatever, then they are opening themselves up for a world of hurt. They either realize this and strive to educate themselves, or take the easier path and whine. I can't believe the tone of these recent posts. I could swear that on their profiles, under the age category, that they are off by at least a decade or two....maybe three. Amazing how any post made by a poster can be twisted into some sort of diabolical agenda aimed at disinformation! So.....how many people are going to read this post and interpret that I just called them fat? -LIPS-

To: Binder who wrote (3497)	8/12/1998 4:33:00 AM
From: James Bender	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7039

Binder I realize that we have no appreciable use for each other but as you have often done in the past....I am going to give insight as to my assessment of why you are getting grief for the web site... First there are several that believe that some facts were not revealed to the masses. Second I for one have caught certain people telling less than truthful statements to people on this thread and on other threads they are talking on. And my final personal problem with the web site is this. I don't think that you two have the experience and or ability to get the job done without hurting people with or without bad intentions. This is not meant as a slam...In todays arena of the OTC, a person just can't get to the truth sometimes no matter how hard you try. Take MIDL for example you would have put out glorified and glowing comments on this stock with nothing but praise for it. Many people would have taken your lead and bought into the problems that were hiding and lurking behind the doors of the company. The second this occurred and people find that you had FREE shares of this company and then everyone is clobbered by the crash, you are done. No matter how hard you try to make people think you were a victim, they are not going to be convinced of the fact. If you do not think that I am right about your abilities then tell me what happened to the research Gabard did on MIDL. He said he did everything possible and researched everything he could find and what happened. It was later discovered that everyone had only scratched the surface of the problems with this company. All the disclaimers in the world will not shield you from all the problems that can come your way...In todays world there is getting to be more and more liabilites you can not assign away with a sign or written warning...You know as you sit there reading this that the web site is intended to attract other investors to buy the stocks that you will be given positions into prior to profiling them on your site. And the sole purpose is to guide and facilitate the investor to purchase what you desire them to. I have strong opinions of Gabard but until I have proof that you have done me wrong my opinion of you is still neutral....good luck...Jim