Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark silvers who wrote (15427)	8/12/1998 7:08:00 PM
From: ShoppinTheNet	Respond to of 20681

"Ledt me get this straight. Chewy(your partner/sympathizer for all practical purposes)" John now that we are partners, will you call me so I can give you my mailing address so you can send those dividend checks from our law practice to my home?

To: mark silvers who wrote (15427)	8/12/1998 7:08:00 PM
From: ShoppinTheNet	Respond to of 20681

"Ledt me get this straight. Chewy(your partner/sympathizer for all practical purposes)" John now that we are partners, will you call me so I can give you my mailing address so you can send those dividend checks from our law practice to my home?

To: mark silvers who wrote (15427)	8/12/1998 7:12:00 PM
From: ShoppinTheNet	Respond to of 20681

"Ledt me get this straight. Chewy(your partner/sympathizer for all practical purposes)asks what Nortons' educational qualifications are(for about the sixth time). When he is given an answer, we are told that it doesnt matter. Why ask the question then?" Mark I alone asked the question and I have not responded to the reply. Why do you meld several peoples post as if they were one person. Would I do the same to you and your side kick the Henery?

To: mark silvers who wrote (15427)	8/12/1998 7:16:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Mark: Pardon me? Last time I looked this was a forum to share information and opinion. Did something change? "Chewy" is neither my "partner" nor does he speak for me. I do not claim to speak for him. On occasion, we disagree about issues concerning Naxos but on the whole I'd say (based on his posts) he agrees more with me than with you. That is a situation I do not feel a need to apologize for nor explain to you or anyone else. I did not say that resumes and qualifications were not important. What I did say was that as a practical matter given recent developments, they matter little, good or bad. We have moved beyond those issues and we can not expect much improvement until we get some answers to the central questions: 1. Does Ledoux stand by its numbers? 2. Assuming there is gold in them thar hills, then how did the verification process go so wrong? I expressed my opinion that SK's concerns about resumes were probably not the central issue we need to concern ourselves with at this juncture. I can't speak to his motives in asking questions about resumes. I have to wonder what exactly your question is Mark because I usually assume your good intentions even though we frequently disagree on most issues concerning this stock. JLA