Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (5222)	8/12/1998 10:34:00 AM
From: EtTuBrute	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

Good post. Im not sure I would have been has harsh ala accusing him of being a 15 yr old, but your post makes very effective points! Mike, why dont you counter this by sharing your DD with us, either privately or publicly. We have ask you to do this many many times, which you refuse to do, which in turn tarnishes any credibility you may have had. Its all about credibility. GG

To: the Chief who wrote (5222)	8/12/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: findstock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Chief you talk the talk, but I am wondering if you walk the walk, you have a good pros of English but an attitude like many who are articulate and intelligent, and that is YOU are above everyone else your comments about Mike were extremely condescending again a characteristic of the "higher" being, I am not taking up for Mike because yes he did create some issue without any substantiation and that is annoying when there is absence of information from the company but some of your posts also created that innuendo issue also, anyway have you seen the NEW house report?....I suggest you see if you can obtain it, and you might be able to see more clearly some situations on MDIN....of course that is if you want to, because you like I said created some innuendo from your posts also, and that is from someone that doesn't own the stock I.E. YOU don't have any exposure to the downside...and I don't really care for that much at all, again the word you used at the top of you mail was innuendo, saying that Mike is 14, well do you know that no you don't, maybe since you have an eloquent use of the english language you look up the word manners.....

To: the Chief who wrote (5222)	8/12/1998 12:31:00 PM
From: mike jameson	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 25548

Chief, you put together quite an itemization of my posts. You then go on to dissect each excerpt with your own interpretation. These interpretations then become parts of the painting that YOU WANT OTHERS TO SEE. I am positive you will also interpret this post. Your ideas about me are 100% wrong. I am what I presented. No more, no less. I am not about to waste my time addressing each of your accusations as not one is true.I was warned, prior to posting here , to expect, understandably so, some skepticism and doubt. I would do the same. Your characterization of me and all of my responses, is more than cynical. It borders on criminal. For the others here with an open mind, is it fair for Chief to extract and interpret only what he wants to draw, with total disregard of and to the exclusion of other extractions, interpretations, and most importantly, possibilities ? I stand behind each of my posts because each post was a result of long hours ( much longer than Chiefs' ) of due diligence .