Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Janssen who wrote (20582)	8/12/1998 4:01:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27012

Ann, all, Anyone near a TV? CNBC is supposed to be having Fleckenstein the bear vs. Battapaglia the bull on at 4:00 Eastern. Might be interesting. Tony

To: Ann Janssen who wrote (20582)	8/23/1998 6:14:00 PM
From: David M Gambs	Respond to of 27012

Ann, Wasn't northridge a 9?? I believe that was a 6.x quake. I do not recall a 7 or larger in the recent past. Regards, dmg (Go INTeL® Go to $200 - [post all splits: past, present & future])

To: Ann Janssen who wrote (20582)	8/23/1998 10:57:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27012

Ann, I missed your post from last week about earthquakes (I think). I also have a post from the Intel thread to drag over here involving Kurlak and Bob Brinker. First, earthquakes, thanks a lot (>wasn't northridge a 9?). A Richter 9 earthquake and I'd have ocean front property, or I'd be sleeping with the fishes! Northridge in 1994 was measured at 6.7. The local one here, Loma Prieta in 1989 was a 7.1. For reference, the 1906 San Francisco was an 8.3. So please, don't even think aboudda 9. I think the all time high measured in the U.S, was in three states...MO, IL and ? It was so big it diverted the Mississippi River and cleared huge forests of all trees which were swallowed up by cracks in the earth. That was a 9. Intel-Kurlak-Brinker: Talk : Semiconductors : Intel \| Previous \| Next \| Respond \| Earnings \| Remove Navigation To: Jim McMannis (63188 ) From: Tony Viola Sunday, Aug 23 1998 10:23PM ET Reply # of 63192 Jim, Re: "A side note, the Intel rep I talked to was well aware of who Tom Kurlak is." I heard yet another opinion on the Kurlak call on Intel stock from this last week, with a different slant this time. It was from Bob Brinker, syndicated radio market timer genius (so far), and was his answer to a call from a fan into his talk show. When asked what he thought of Kurlak's call, Brinker said 'not much.' He continued to say that the guy blew it in calling the price movement of Intel stock, as it rose from mid-high 60's to low 90's, while being bearish on Intel all the while. He concluded saying that since the guy was so out of it re price direction on Intel recently, he wouldn't pay much attention to last week's call. Tony