SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Oracle Corporation (ORCL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8036)8/12/1998 5:04:00 PM
From: Still Rolling  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 19080
 
ZDNet AnchorDesk
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 12, 1998
Oracle's Hidden Weakness
Jesse Berst, Editorial Director
ZDNet AnchorDesk

A home buyer's worst nightmare. The house looks great on the outside, sturdy and solid. But unbeknownst, dry rot is silently destroying the foundation.

Oracle is the world's leading maker of industrial-strength database software with roughly 30% of the $7 billion market. It's an imposing edifice from the outside. In reality, five factors are invisibly eating away at its business.

1. Slowing Database Market. Despite the occasional strong quarter, sales of Oracle's "classic" relational database are leveling off. These days, Oracle actually makes more money from two other sources: services (consulting) and applications software (which runs on top of its database). Although those areas are growing, they also bring problems (see below).

2. Outmoded Business Model. The very things that got Oracle to the top may be its downfall -- slick, expensive salespeople and a focus on the high end. Like all low-volume, high-cost businesses, Oracle is vulnerable to a competitor who offers 80% of the functionality for half the price. A competitor like Microsoft, with its low-cost, high-volume, commodity approach.

My prediction. The threat from Microsoft SQL Server seems worrisome in 1998. By this time next year, it will be a major challenge that adversely impacts Oracle's earnings and stock price.

3. Poor Partnering Skills. As the Wall Street Journal reported last month, Microsoft is quickly recruiting an army of partners, many of them former Oracle loyalists. Microsoft can afford to outspend Oracle as long as it takes to buy their love. Oracle's arrogance and its propensity to compete with its partners also helps drive them into Microsoft's arms.

4. I-Hate-Bill Disease. This malady has infected many an executive before Oracle's Larry Ellison, including Novell's Ray Noorda and Bob Frankenberg, Borland's Philippe Kahn and Sun's Scott McNealy. One symptom is an obsession with beating Bill Gates instead of delighting customers. Executives with this disease do things to hurt Microsoft instead of to help their constituency.

5. Flawed Vision. I-hate-Bill disease also distorts vision. In his urge to beat Bill, Larry Ellison takes his company outside its core competency. And when he does that, he wastes time and money on wrong-headed schemes. Like his silly 500-channel TV idea. His abortive efforts to buy Apple. His failed network computing initiative.

To be sure, Oracle has many strengths. Its sales force is one of the best in the world. Its high-end database is much more powerful, reliable and scalable than the Microsoft equivalent. And it has competitors like Sybase and Informix that insist on shooting themselves in the foot. Oracle can probably grow for several more years just by gobbling market share away from its bumbling rivals.

But even the biggest building will topple if dry rot destroys the foundation. Or if a competitor like Microsoft eats away from the low end of the market. Oracle's many strengths may not be enough unless it moves quickly to fix the rot at its core.