Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : THE OZONE COMPANY! (OZON) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CIN-CIU-E who wrote (3409)	8/12/1998 4:04:00 PM
From: CIN-CIU-E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4356

AN APOLOGY FROM THE YAHOO OZON THREAD: _____________________________________________________________________ Seems like I stirred up a bit of a hornets nest over at Cyclopss. My friend Ben Wofford just called and told me over voice mail that I had "twisted" the facts and that I should set things right. This I shall do and follow some wise advice I have received. "stay off this thread." I am sorry for any trouble I caused anyone at Cyclopss. I just wanted to let some of you investors know what I had heard. Big mistake, I regret ever getting on this thread and sharing what I knew. It has gained me nothing and perhaps lost a very dear friend. I am "eating crow" as it were to set things as straight as I can. I am a sales tech in the laundry industry not a businessman and perhaps this will teach me to keep my thoughts to myself. My comment on the 18k was only to show what I thought was a bad business decision. It was in no wise to imply any thing was done against the law. It was not. It was just an unfortunate decision that was not cost effective. Many of these decisions happen throughout all of our business endeavors. Cyclopss is involved far more broadly in other ozone arenas than just laundry ozone applications. I wish them well and can only hope that the comments I made will be viewed from the perspective of a friend that was upset over another friends losing a job. It is my opinion that Ben Wofford played a key role in the ozone end of things. I was bitter over the manner he was fired. Yes, I did think Bill Stoddard should have done it. However, chain of command is there for a reason. My perspective from a laundry side of things is that Ozone in laundry does in fact work. It does have a place in the industry. However, it is extremely costly and must be monitored daily. If the equipment is maintained daily and the proper formulation is applied, it will do what Cyclopss and other ozone companies state it will do. I wish all of you well in your investments.