To: Cytokine1 who wrote (5469 ) 8/12/1998 8:41:00 PM From: Biomaven Respond to of 9719
Well guys, I'm back from my vacation to find someone's been trashing the market in my absence. I'm not sure which is more scary - the plight of some biotechs, our hairy Paris taxi ride to the airport (visions of Diana) or a somewhat too close encounter with some lions in a South African game park at night. One concern is that we may get a kind of death spiral, with each fund manager not wanting to be the last to leave town. This would certainly produce some luscious values, but most of us won't have the cash to enjoy them. On the up side, I suspect we may well see some M&A activity. If this is horizontal it may not do much for the individual stocks or the market (like AXPH), but if it comes from above (Merck etc.) then it may do wonders. One key area to watch are the biotechs who have sales but still have very weak stock prices (like AGPH, NXTR, SEQU, PGNS, PDLI). Some of these (like the first three) would clearly be accretive to a big pharma, even at a considerable premium. As for what strategy to adopt, I would stay away from anything that is going to need finance within a year or so to survive. (Most biotechs aren't in bad shape capital wise, actually). I don't think the early stage companies are going to move before the late stage ones in general, and so I'd tilt towards the sort of companies that Jim Silverman likes - stuff like PGNS, MLNM and SEPR (of course). I personally have stayed somewhat hedged, which up to now has been fortunate. I remain very bullish on SEPR, and have obstinately stuck with my PCYC. I also own some Rick-type companies like BTRN - good science, trading near cash. I've taken some profits in MOGN, but still own it. Today was actually a pretty good one for most biotechs. Hope it continues that way. Peter