Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bmart who wrote (51301)	8/12/1998 11:19:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Wow BMart.. you and Pugs think just alike...:) To: +Riley G (45145 ) From: +Pugs Wednesday, Apr 8 1998 12:27AM ET Reply # of 51305 Riley, Tell me what you think, this may or may not be true. In my DD I asked s martin & Tonto a very important question, they both evaded it, so here goes, you'll see why this is important to RMIL ... * Tonto posts he bought a 70K long position on GIFS. * Kugler suggests a short squeeze. * GIFS announces that Suisse Private Banking Group, Ltd. will purchase their CRIC unit. * BDO bows out saying they can't verify CRIC's assetts and the deal appears dead. * meanwhile, GIFS's TA resigns, there is a problem with the shares in the float, whether they all are authentic or not, and GIFS announces they will be their own TA. * Suisse Private Banking Group says they can verify the assets and the deal is on, Suisse will purchase CRIC for "securities" * Tonto 'now' discovers that Zayed & co. are criminals, and Kugler suggests shareholders consider selling, remember, when Tonto said he was 70K long, he went to Gayle Essary to inform him about his suspicions about GIFS. Essary writes an article proclaiming Tonto as a "shorty" * Suisse Private Banking group. Ltd, who purchased the CRIC for securities, is a possible translation for 'Societe' Fianciere Privee'', a DVBC/Mork co. ! No one will acknowledge if they can verify that for me, I can't seem to do so. *"IF" they are one and the same, that means, 1) If they shorted against the counterfeit certs, 2) they now had 'legitimate' certs to cover with. This is still guesswork on my part, ....and if this scenario is true, this can explain, by the presence of these players here on the RMIL thread, with no admitted position or reason for being here, why they want to make folks believe RMIL is a "scam", its profitable for them. Pugs