Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shasta23 who wrote (5997)	8/13/1998 12:10:00 AM
From: bdog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11149

Stef dude. Not to be sorry. I very much appreciate a forum like this where there are more eyes to find a solution. I'm sure glad Bob woke me up with the "Berndog, you dolt! Upgrade!" You will have to change the line mday1:=(daysloaded)-1; to mday1:=(daysloaded-1)-1; as Alain pointed out. But you ask me why? LOL! I'm not as smart as the things I work on! ! I'll try: When I was looking for a solution mine ran funny too when I entered the -2199. It just ran through numbers and no stocks. My guess is that it's ok to call out the max value 2200 for a daystoload function and it loads however many there are but a max() function needs the appropriate amount or you get an out of bounds penalty from the Q+ code crunch police. So by using the variable mday1 you can use the program itself to enter the correct value. bdog