Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FBN Associates - Year 2000/Y2K IPO!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (1471)	8/13/1998 1:23:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2770

I categorically reject the insinuation that there are any defects in the main () code. It speaks for itself and I resent any attempts to undermine it with Meaningless Indexes of Performance such as "ISO 9000". We test with ISO 10000 already anyway. In this type of code defects may be an actual advantage in the development stage as it serves not to give a false sense of security. Run the code again. Load Main () into any ANSI C compiler and run it. I think you will be satisifed that it performs as it should. You may wish to include some standard header files if your system balks. The rock solid stability of the nucleus kernel and complete absence of defects or any system related bugs puts the new OS at a terrific advantage to the crippled mutating code that is out there. Quite simply the code runs on any machine. It is scalable and will not crash under any circumstance. Compatibility has been a watchword in code development and testing has been to say the least rigorous. EC<:-}