Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal Oak-RYO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (1185)	8/13/1998 12:26:00 PM
From: Michael Bidder	Respond to of 1706

Quoate the offending statement please. Where did I state or even imply : "Saying there's no gold at Kemess may be libelous and is incorrect. MB

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (1185)	8/13/1998 12:42:00 PM
From: Michael Bidder	Respond to of 1706

Retraction! I was wrong in my statement about Kemess. The following statement was not meant to imply that I believe Kemess to have no gold. Upon re-reading this statement I can see how it could easily have been read that way. <<<Tom whether you are buying a T.V. in a parking lot that turns out to be a a box with a brick in it or a $500 million dollar gold mine that has no gold the principle is the same, deception. Tom what's the difference between Bre-X and Kemess? The only difference is that with Kemess you have "plausable deniability".>>> Yes This is incorrect. I went way to far. Sorry MB