Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (6976)	8/13/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, <<I should have been more precise>> <<a resin process which works on their ore but it would not work on Global's ore>> What is the basis for that statement? PS, I talked to Runyon this morning, Maxam's resin process works for Maxam's ore.

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (6976)	8/13/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: SnakeInATuxedo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Perhaps I missed the item wherein it was mentioned that Maxam has run some of Global's ore through their process; or that Global has run Maxam's ore through theirs. So can we categorically say that Maxam's process "...would not work" on Global's ore? I continue to believe there would be benefits to both* companies* if this were tried. EVERY additional insight into how these ores give up the goodies is essential at this stage of the process. Since there's absolutely no need for any sort of "beggar-thy-neighbour" viewpoint from either company toward the other, co-operation in unlocking the secrets of extraction would be of mutual self-interest. Yo! Mr. Jensen... Mr. Runyon.... trade a couple tons of ore, and have at it.