Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (3733)	8/13/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: sks1	Respond to of 7039

anyone got a better number than the recorder in Colorado (303) for Mark Pierce or anyone else at Midland?

To: one_less who wrote (3733)	8/13/1998 4:01:00 PM
From: Binder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

Brees, I meant that I find it hard to believe that Spriggs' could not have known that "his" patents were in default due to non-pay. Think about it, if you held a patent to something as revolutionary as this product is supposed to be, wouldn't you make sure they were so that no one could take them away from you? Especially before you did a deal with a company who was telling the world about your product. I don't mean to rain on anyone's parade or anything like that. It may turn out that what you have heard will pan out. I am simply of the belief that it will not, and that Midland will not be in the fuel additive business. This is 100% speculation on my part, and not based on any hard fact. Heck, maybe they'll prove me wrong. :-) Binder