SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Caussa Capital (formerly Antares) T.CAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: UNDERTAKER who wrote (4345)8/14/1998 12:57:00 AM
From: Robert F  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4718
 
So let me ask a hypothetical question. Let's assume that a president of a company does make money on an undeclared promotion. Maybe he or she makes it on the rise, or by selling short, or something more fancy as you two have been discussing. In short, he or she is not lily white. Does this president forfeit his or her right to silence the critics. If we assume the critics are the ones who lost the money that the insiders made, do the critics not have a right to complain?



To: UNDERTAKER who wrote (4345)8/14/1998 9:44:00 AM
From: Elizabeth Andrews  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4718
 
I can't believe that you could tape a phone conversation with, say your broker, not tell him that you're doing so and then use that in court as evidence against him. How would the court know that the tape had not been edited? Doesn't sound right to me.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News