SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: soup who wrote (16667)8/14/1998 9:24:00 AM
From: Andrew Danielson  Respond to of 213177
 
Macintouch says Apple facility is now producing 8,000 iMacs a day.

That figure is a hell of a lot better, if it were true. Running 7 days a week, that means 56,000 weekly.

Andrew



To: soup who wrote (16667)8/14/1998 9:55:00 AM
From: Eric Yang  Respond to of 213177
 
As Tim pointed out yesterday on Yahoo, Steve Jobs will be a guest on CNBC MarketWrap at 4:00pm ET.

Eric



To: soup who wrote (16667)8/14/1998 9:58:00 AM
From: smartInvestor  Respond to of 213177
 
Intel and BYTE: and also just the opposite, Intel instructed BYTE to re-run all the tests under conditions that were more favorable to the Pentium and the results still indicated huge performance advantages on the PPC's side.

Megahert for megahert, the PPC is indisputably higher performing. Given that there are a large number of variables making up actual real-world performance (very important things like compiler quality, programming efficiencies, bus speeds, I/O, graphics display, etc. etc.) Wintel-based machines can hold their own in many situations and outperform in many as well. Some of this is because Apple approached the OS from the standpoint that the user should be in control (for instance, the MacOS burns a lot of cycles waiting VERY attentively for the user to move the mouse). Many other bottlenecks will be overcome as Apple improves logic boards and moves to MacOS X. Hopefully Apple will continue to treat the user with respect.



To: soup who wrote (16667)8/14/1998 10:03:00 AM
From: Linda Kaplan  Respond to of 213177
 
Soup sez: INTC, through CNET, of which it is an owner *bought*, and subsequently *closed* BYTE after lobbying them to change their standards. INTC didn't want an impartial publication backing up AAPL's claims.

YES! The ultimate punishment. BYTE was bought and KILLED because the benchmarks supported that the Mac was faster than the Intel based machine. A legal murder, but a murder nevertheless. A moment of silence to honor BYTE's integrity, for which it died.

Linda