SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Point and Figure Charting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis J. who wrote (5841)8/14/1998 3:41:00 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34824
 
Does the Princess qualify???

Message 5499507



To: Dennis J. who wrote (5841)8/14/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: Judy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34824
 
Dennis, when I was 25 I was a perfect size 8. Now quite a few years later I am a size 4. Yeah, right. No wonder stocks like ANN are making new highs!



To: Dennis J. who wrote (5841)8/14/1998 4:29:00 PM
From: Ms. X  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34824
 
Thank you very much Dennis. That was too funny.



To: Dennis J. who wrote (5841)8/14/1998 4:51:00 PM
From: flashy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34824
 
Are you trying to get brownie points from the
P&F women?????????

You must have caught the P&F womens club snapshot
on Jan's website to see that we all are TRULY SIZE 2
women!!!!!!!

:} :}



To: Dennis J. who wrote (5841)8/16/1998 6:20:00 PM
From: mph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34824
 
(re: Your Friday afternoon off-topic)

I see nothing wrong with women aspiring to small sizes. I will not buy anything if I can't fit into the correct size. I will simply wait until I do.

Part of the problem, I believe, is that women have been improperly socialized/brainwashed when it comes to sizes. For example, the concept of 6 inches has been so misrepresented to women that they are unable to distinquish between half a foot and something significantly shorter......<g>

mph