SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : IATV - ACTV Interactive Television -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mike.com who wrote (2463)8/14/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: Jon Scott  Respond to of 4748
 
The company is on the threshold of going from R&D to revenue generating.
Even better, they don't have the huge capital expenditures and maintenance costs as the cable companies do, yet they're in great position to benefit from the infrastructure.
Most cable/satellite companies are still not profitable as a result of the initial costs. ACTV will see black soon.
Their alliances are clear evidence as to the validity and the potential of ACTV. The ongoing roll-out of digital service including the million boxes plus that have ACTV software included should remove ANY remaining doubt.



To: mike.com who wrote (2463)8/15/1998 11:45:00 AM
From: ed doell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4748
 
>>the company's results, which have admittedly been poor. That's why it's
a $2 stock.<<

****************

I couldn't have stated it better. But why belabor the obvious?

I don't think there's a person on this thread who is wondering why this stock is a $1-$2 stock. The last report says why the stock hovers in this price range. The history of the financings also say why.

But to start bashing women and management at this point begs the question, What's the motivation to belabor the obvious, and to make derogatory remarks about women and ACTV management? That is my point.

And you are very right to urge caution. Rather than rely on posts by Cowardboy and menmailmen or Ed or Art or Atheist, I urge potential shareholders take a trip to NYC to visit ACTV HQ and decide for themselves as a part of their dd.

IMHO it's a small price to pay for "primary certitude" or abstinence.

Mike, I assure you, I am more than willing to listen to both sides of the story, for example, your reasoning in your post, but I will not accept gratuitous derogatory remarks about ACTV management (whom I doubt that he has spoken with), ACTV personnel, and, in addition, women in general.

Best regards,

Ed