Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: H. K. Boner who wrote (8971)	8/14/1998 6:25:00 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11708

These are serious issues you bring up. The thought that CSMA unilaterally cancelled the agreement to divert cash from a financing that your group funded is a very serious allegation. CSMA, to public knowledge, had not received any financing from the LPS transaction. Official management claims are that the Company expended approximately $165,000 for startup costs related to the LPS operation. If CSMA had put up their own money,as they have implied from their comments, it would lend great support to their claim for having had a valid reason to reluctantly cancel the agreement, i.e., CSMA would say: "Why would we just out and out cancel an agreement for no good cause, in light of the fact that we put this substantial amount of our own money into the deal? We had to have good reason, right?" However, if CSMA had not put up their own money, and actually received funds from your sources, that would be another matter entirely. What documentation do you have to support this rather serious charge? As an aside, I did see the independent consultant's conclusion that the sea soil could support a value of at least $450/ton. The same day assignments with different amounts($180 and $450) did appear strange, nevertheless. TG