Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (871)	8/14/1998 7:02:00 PM
From: Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34857

Margin Mike: Your arguments were good until... "[e]ven in your evil world...(sic)..." Where did I state that? Question 1: Do you know anything about Patents/Intellectual Property? Take a look at my profile. People patent the most worthless things. In my opinion, it is to prevent a competitor to do that. However, just because a method was patented one way, does not mean it can't be patented another. Remember, there was a patent on the automobile, but others patented different variations. Prove to me this: "..the cost and dificulty would be prohibitivly more expencive then buying IPR." I am asking you to prove it to me. Show me proof! Remember, many companies have refused to pay for licensing and have opted to go to the court system to invalidate patents. This method has been done by companies none other than QCOM. dave