To: RocketMan who wrote (21784 ) 8/16/1998 12:01:00 AM From: Bird Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 50264
RocketMan wrote: >What is my organization? >Finally, there was a recent legal case in California where someone got a year in jail for >sending a death threat over email. Are you aware of that case? Also, I understand that >libel laws are beginning to be applied to internet posts as well. Are you aware of that? Sir, What are you talking about? I offer to leave in the past the personal diatribes you and your other aliases have leveled against me, and you immediately post this affront? My last message focused entirely on the technology and contracts DGIV is involved in; true, it wasn't a positive opinion on my part, but certainly not deserving of "a year in jail"! Further, when an SI member makes a reference to "Heaven" in a post, it should not be immediately classified as a death threat. I am a very religious individual, and whether I like it or not subjects introspective of the topic seem to weave their way into my thinking and onto the screen. Message 5482756 As many divinity students will recognize, when I said "There are no aliases in Heaven" I meant that upon our final judgement men will be seen by the all knowing eye of God, unable to hide our true self or "selves" in your case. Let's once again try to get off to a fresh start. For a second time: I am willing from this point on to bury the hatchet and focus strictly on the issues.-issues such as DGIV's contract locations These are area contracts for RURAL PSTN's - not mining stakes around Sutter's Mill. I believe citing the billions of dollars in IP-Telephony and tieing that into what DGIV is doing through Jimmy Chins whirlwind tour of the third world is exaggeration at best. I keep wanting to go back to that 16th and last contract offered by Indonesia. The "billions" to be made are in the urban PSTN's where long distance traffic is heaviest. Those other 15 contracts which DGIV does not have probably compose the better geographic areas comprising cities. I venture a good guess that the last remaining piece of the puzzle that the major telco's passed on does not include any part of Indonesia's scarce urban areas. A typical call from "area 16" is more likely to be a local call from the fishing wharf to the village market for a price on squid. Whether in Asia or Europe this scenario has probably repeated itself; bottom line is that there is no way DGIV is going to squeeze major telco's out of IP-Telephony. It just aint gonna happen. Regards,