SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (15939)8/15/1998 7:08:00 PM
From: Alex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116995
 
Me too Bobby. Here's a blast from the past...................

Expert sees Dow declining to triple digits
By Rick Ackerman
OF THE EXAMINER STAFF ÿSunday, August 16, 1998
<Picture>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXACTLY 16 years ago, with the Dow Jones industrial average wallowing in the doldrums near 800, market theorist Robert S. Prechter tweaked Wall Street's imagination with his prediction that the most spectacular bull market in history was about to begin.

And so it did, right on schedule, with a seismic lurch in mid-August 1982 that forever etched itself into the memory of anyone who was working in the trading pits, as I was.

In the decade that followed, with the Dow ratcheting inexorably toward Prechter's once seemingly unattainable target of 3,600, his influence and fame became legend.

But the Gainesville, Ga., guru's celebrity turned to notoriety after the target was reached in 1993 and he waxed increasingly bearish over the next several years. His 1996 book, "At the Crest of the Tidal Wave," forecast global deflation and depression just when the bull market was shifting into high gear.

Lately, though, stock averages have faltered alarmingly with some stunning one-day drops, and the economy has begun to slow. Could the bull market finally be over? We asked Prechter, who prognosticates for his company, Elliott Wave International, whose answer was unequivocal.

Q: Are we in a bear market now?

A: Absolutely. The evidence is so overwhelming that I would be shocked if we haven't seen the all-time high.

Q: What are the signs?

A: The most important is that, from April to June, secondary stocks completed a decline of five waves just before the blue chips hit new highs.

Q: That's what technical analysts call a bearish non-confirmation, right?

A: That's right. When one sector continues in an old trend while another holds back, it is a sign that the old trend may be tiring.

Q: What else?

A: The last important high occurred on Friday, July 17. July 18 marked the date on which the duration of the advance (in the Standard & Poor 500 Index) from the bear market low in October 1974 precisely matched the number of days from the bear market bottom in 1942 to the bull market top in 1966.

Q: So a major bullish cycle is ending?

A: Yes, a very major cycle. It's the same size as the one associated with the South Sea Bubble in 1720. (The South Sea Bubble refers to a historic stock market crash that sent London markets tumbling after speculation in government-chartered trading companies artificially inflated equity prices.) When it ended, the average stock dropped 98.5 percent, if you factor in companies that went out of business. It took 100 years for the stock market to get back to where it was before the South Sea Bubble collapsed.

Q: And this bubble is just as big?

A: In percentage terms it's actually bigger. Since 1982, the Dow has outstripped both the South Sea Bubble and the Japanese mania that began in 1974.

Q: Does all of that imply we're in for something worse than a run-of-the-mill bear market?

A: I think so. A.J. Frost and I predicted in 1978 that the Dow would fall back to triple digits when the bull market ended.

Q: How low?

A: I've given subscribers (to The Elliott Wave Theorist) a specific number, but let's just say that the next few months could be worse than the crash that occurred in the final months of 1929.

Q: That would imply a collapse of more than 50 percent, right?

A: That's right. Secondary stocks in particular are likely to get hit the hardest. Stocks that have already fallen from $60 to $17 will be trading at $2, and the ones that have gone from $5 to $70 will be back down to $5.

Q: Why do you expect secondary issues to take the brunt of the initial hit?

A: Every year for the last four years analysts have recommended loading up on secondaries because they have underperformed the market, but that's not a good argument for buying something. It usually means it will be the sector that gets hurt the worst. I have a 12-year cycle bottom in secondary stocks' relative performance due in the fourth quarter of this year.

Q: So what happens after stocks hit bottom in the first big collapse?

A: There will be a huge rally, but not to new highs.

Q: And then how long will it take for the Dow to fall to triple digits?

A: The absolute low should occur sometime around 2003 or 2004. If that works out, the market will begin a rally that could last for two decades, although it will not be nearly as powerful as the one that just ended.

Q: Will there be any political fallout from the market's decline?

A: Clinton probably won't make it to the end of his second term. Whoever gets elected in 2000 will also be in for trouble.

Q: What can investors do to protect themselves?

A: They should take their money out of stocks and put it into Treasury bills. There's also a mutual fund I mentioned in the last newsletter. We are fully invested in it. It's the only place I know of where you can get downside leverage without using margin.

Q: How so?

A: It's not the same as being short. It's really an inverted long. If the S&P falls by 50 percent, your investment would gain 100 percent, and if falls by 75 percent, you'll make 200 percent. When the S&P doubles in price, the fund only loses half of its value.

Q: How about defensive issues such as consumer non-durables, which are not affected by recession as severely as some other stocks?

A: In an average bear market, 90 percent of stocks go down, but this time it will be closer to 99 percent, so there will be few places to hide in stocks.

Q: What about gold, which has always been viewed as good insurance against economic catastrophe?

A: I'm a gold bug, and I think it will be the buy of a lifetime sometime in the next few years, but for now, the technical picture is still bearish. My long-term target remains below $200 per ounce.

Q: With the deflation that has been choking Asia's economies now spreading to Latin America and elsewhere, why do economists continue to obsess about the supposed threat of inflation?

A: People are always fighting the last war. It's normal at this point in the cycle for everyone to miss the change. For deflation to take hold, it has to catch people by surprise; otherwise, long cycles of inflation and deflation would not occur.

Q: How is deflation related to the bear market you have predicted?

A: We've been in a benign, disinflationary phase for the last 18 years. If the market collapses, it will signal that we have crossed over from stability to deflation.

Q: Is there anything else you'd like to say?

A: Just that it is very upsetting that so many people -- from fund managers to university professors to authors -- have been telling the public that having all their assets in stocks is as safe as having them in a savings account. To anyone who asks, I would encourage them as strongly as possible to protect their assets while they can.

Rick Ackerman forecasts stock, index and commodity futures prices for market professionals in his daily newsletter, Little Black Box Forecasts. His e-mail address is rick@vval.com.

Get a printer-friendly version of this article

ON THE GATE
<Picture: Bay Area Backroads>

c1998 San Francisco Examiner ÿ

Examiner Hot News

sfgate.com



To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (15939)8/15/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: Alex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116995
 
Here's a good article on the flooding. If you click on the link, the site provides a map...................

UNDER THE UNFORGIVING SKY

The worst flood in recent memory creates havoc along the Yangzi

By Sangwon Suh

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Map The Yangzi shows little mercy

In Over His Head? Four months after he became premier, Zhu Rongji's honeymoon is over as his country's problems mount

AND THE RAIN KEPT coming. As the heavens poured out their wrath, the mortals below struggled to cope with their watery punishment. Mother Nature has a habit of reminding us humans from time to time that she cannot be subdued by our so-called advanced knowledge and cutting-edge technology. This summer, that reminder struck home across the world - in the form of titanic floods - from the U.S. to Bangladesh to South Korea.

Hardest hit, perhaps by virtue of its sheer size, has been China. Floods caused by monsoon rains are an annual occurrence in the Middle Kingdom, of course. But this year, the Yangzi River, historically known for overflowing its banks, decided to show what it is really capable of. Experts declared the latest deluge to be the worst in recent memory - worse, in fact, than the Last Big One in 1954. That left over 30,000 dead - far more than the 2,000 deaths so far acknowledged by the authorities this time - but whereas just 19 million people were affected by the floods then, the 1998 disaster will go down in history as having changed the lives of some 240 million - or close to the entire population of the U.S.

A bulk of those affected make their homes along the middle-to-lower reaches of the mighty river, between Chongqing and Jiujiang. As water levels hit critical heights, the authorities mobilized People's Liberation Army troops, ordinary citizens and even prisoners to evacuate residents and shore up the embankments. In Jiujiang, several riverboats were sunk in a desperate bid to plug a gap in the dikes. But as the waters continued to threaten major cities, including the industrial center of Wuhan, regional officials resorted to sacrificing farmlands for urban areas: they blew up a number of smaller levees in the countryside to divert the water and reduce the pressure on the cities. In Jianli, the authorities evacuated some 50,000 local residents before carrying out such an exercise. The never-ending efforts and constant vigilance appeared to have their effect: on Aug. 10, the fourth flood crest passed Wuhan without incident (water levels, though, reached 29.39 m - the second-highest in the city's history).

While the battle to control the floodwaters continued, there were, perhaps predictably, attempts to apportion blame. According to environmental official Zhuang Guotai, the roots of the disaster lay in the massive deforestation that occurred along the Yangzi valley during the Great Leap Forward, Mao's ill-conceived campaign launched in the late 1950s to achieve rapid industrialization. "The damage to this vegetation cover," he said, "has led to soil erosion, mud and sand washing down the river and raising the river bed" - meaning a relatively small increase in flow is enough to bring the water to dangerously high levels.

Meanwhile, critics of the controversial Three Gorges Dam project farther upstream charged that funds going into the enterprise could have been put to better use in the repair and reinforcement of existing flood-control systems. They also claimed that even when complete, the dam would be ineffective in preventing future floods. "Sediment deposition behind the proposed dam will rapidly reduce its capacity to store floodwaters," said California-based International Rivers Network. Beijing authorities were quick to hit back at such assertions. If the dam had been in operation, insisted flood-control official Zhao Chunming, "the water level in the lower reaches would not have been that high and the flood-control task would not have been that arduous."

The Yangzi valley was not the only region in China hit by torrential rains. The northeastern province of Heilongjiang also experienced heavy flooding, as did Inner Mongolia, where a collapsing dike left thousands trapped. The overall death toll, though, remains uncertain. Chinese authorities have been reluctant to disclose such data, preferring instead to focus on heroic efforts to battle the floods.

With the rain showing no sign of abating, the danger is not over yet and the misery of Chinese flood victims looks set to continue for the time being. But at least they don't have wayward ordnance to worry about. In neighboring South Korea, where the death toll from the floods is nearing 300, raging waters swept away nearly 10 tons of munitions from military barracks, including grenades and landmines. There has already been one casualty - a man who lost four toes when he stepped on a stray anti-personnel mine.

- With reporting by David Hsieh/Beijing

pathfinder.com



To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (15939)8/16/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Respond to of 116995
 
Dubai eyes strong gold demand after India monsoon
08:55 a.m. Aug 16, 1998 Eastern

DUBAI, Aug 16 (Reuters) - A good monsoon in India this year is set to bolster demand for gold from Dubai in the next month or so, precious metals dealers in the downtown souk said on Sunday.

They said the Indian rainy season, which agricultural experts predict will produce a bumper 1998 crop, was likely to spur gold re-exports from the Gulf Arab state by mid-September.

''Bullion export business should pick up around September 15 because dealers in India will start to re-stock and by October 10 retail business should start peaking,'' one trader said.

The southwest monsoon brings about 80 percent of the annual rainfall in India, where agriculture employs two-thirds of the workers and accounts for more than a quarter of its gross domestic product.

It largely determines demand for the metal in the world's largest gold buyer, which last year consumed about 737 tonnes.

''There should be very good demand for ten tola (TT) bars as the monsoon has been very good,'' a trader said, adding that the end of the monsoon signalled the start of the wedding and festival season -- a boom time for Indian bullion dealers.

While traders predict good demand for the TT bar from Dubai, they say a large chunk of the demand will also be met directly from source thanks to the liberalisation of Indian import rules.

Late last year India allowed more state banks to import gold directly, effectively bypassing the redistribution hub of Dubai.

This has put pressure on the premium of Dubai's benchmark TT bar. Dealers said the premium -- which covers insurance costs and trader margin -- was at around $1 an ounce in the week to Sunday. This compares with the normal $1.25 premium.

''There has been a shakeout because of the direct shipments. Some traders who were depending on Indian demand for TTs are now undercutting the local sellers and so there is a price war. The premium is now at $1,'' one said.

The lower premium and weaker international gold prices pushed the price of the benchmark bar -- 3.746 ounces of 24-carat gold -- down to 3,927 dirhams ($1,070) in Dubai from 3,960 dirhams a week earlier.

''There is still room for the premium to go down another 10 cents,'' one dealer said.

Spot international gold was last quoted on Saturday at $283.85/284.35 an ounce from $286.40/286.90 a week earlier.

($1-3.67 dirhams)

Copyright 1998 Reuters Limited