SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MARKHAR who wrote (12302)8/16/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: C Hudson  Respond to of 34075
 
Great post MARKHAR!



To: MARKHAR who wrote (12302)8/16/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: the Chief  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34075
 
MARKHAR. What you fail to understand is their are two opinions "pros and cons", do you have a problem with that! Let me give you an example from your own diatribe;

How many reports and/or verifications do you need? Let's look at the chronology. Guido's report was a verification of the Trites Report which was a verification of the Viscarra Report which was a verification of the U.N. Report which was a verification of the report done for Cambiol when Guido was their primary geologist. I ask you again, rjbac, how many f---ing reports do you want? What is the magic number? (I wonder, how many times a day you pinch an arm, verifying your own existence?).

How many of these reports "found" the "microflakes" that catapulted this property from .08g/t-1.5g/t (debateable economics) to the astounding 14g/t (economical)?

Amazing how one little question seems to reduce the number of viable reports to a much smaller number doesn't it!! Don't start throwing out your "facts" unless you are willing to dissect in complete detail. I left this thread because of "selective reading" you my opponent, have just joined that club"!!

have a nice day!

the Chief



To: MARKHAR who wrote (12302)8/16/1998 8:03:00 PM
From: rjbac  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34075
 
I have done much DD and have owned this stock twice in the last 12 months. But I have to admit there is only a couple of things I am sure of; one is that you are a flaming A$$hole. The other is that without 3rd party verification of Guido's "creatively speculative" report,(that no one has seen except the SEC and they have stated that additional charges may come from issuing the press release of May 22 which is supposedly based on this "report"), the PARTY IS OVER. But for the sake of the many good people who are on this thread, not you of course, I hope MINE is the real deal...

Bac