SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bob zagorin who wrote (24612)8/17/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
bob, I thought that the 11:05:56 trade of 46K at 8 11/16 was you :-).



To: bob zagorin who wrote (24612)8/17/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: Wallace Rivers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
Bob, and this is meant in a purely "devil's advocate" manner, and not meant to tear down this stock or its' fundamentals further.
Not saying the analysts are right or wrong (who the h#%^ knows?!), rather that there are underlying currents (investment banking opportunities, etc.) why they push a stock. I've been slapped around more than a few times by the "experts" and their recos. I do like the fact that these analysts are hanging tough when the stock is depressed, rather than throwing in the towel when stocks are IMHO at or near bottoms (example ML today in the oils - where was this and other firms when the majority of these stocks were 100% and 200% higher? Probably pound the table Buy.). The latter happens, I feel too often.



To: bob zagorin who wrote (24612)8/17/1998 11:24:00 AM
From: Hippieslayer  Respond to of 32384
 
In all fairness, while all the houses had strong buys (at least for a year now if not longer)the stock has been abysmal. Houses tend to be wrong many times as well. Over that last year, you'd been better off listening to us great sayers than the anal-ysts.

WE have seen many reiterations of buys for this stock. None of the recs have ever moved the stock.

IOW, these recs are like window dressing. There's nothing substantive behind them.