Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Seuss who wrote (12880)	8/17/1998 11:29:00 AM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18691

Do you guys think this is an all male thread? A little decorum, please. I'll stay out of your locker room, keep your locker room talk there. Barb

To: Dr. Seuss who wrote (12880)	8/17/1998 10:50:00 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 18691

<< I think that the real crime here is that Star has spent near $50M of our money under the guise of investigating whitewater to prove the pres got a little nickie on the side. Really, did we need to prove that he lied about this? Or is it's Stars way (and his puppetiers) to take a chink at the pres because they couldn't nail him on the witewater BS? Pretty expensive way to cover ones ass at the taxpayers expense. >> Not true. This is a case of perjury and inciting perjury, not nickies. It all started with Vernon Jordan's transmittal of hush money to Webster Hubbell. And you carefully omit the dozens of counts that came back guilty in jury trials of 15 or 20 people connected to the Clintons in one way or another. Why do so many Clinto apologists so conveniently forget this? Victor