SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (52227)8/17/1998 6:22:00 PM
From: Mighty Mizzou  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
I see HWP + ASND + SRA able to match this type of functionality. (eom)



To: djane who wrote (52227)8/17/1998 8:42:00 PM
From: hitesh puri  Respond to of 61433
 
SS7 related product introduction at ascend.com
Info is very heartening. Amazes me that how short sighted the investment community is. I too was in that camp for a couple of days till I read the product breadth of Stratus at their website and saw light.
You have analysts saying "Why did they have to do this now ?" or "Things were going great, this will slow their growth." etc. etc.

Find that hard to believe. Maybe we should say to them "Why did you have to grow up ? Your analysis did not improve over time ?"

-hitesh



To: djane who wrote (52227)8/18/1998 2:08:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 61433
 
Peering Group Of Eight Plans New Company
(via the fine VoIP thread)

The crux of the problem is high packet loss from poor-quality interconnections between networks at the public exchange points.

August 17, 1998

Inter@ctive Week via NewsEdge Corporation : A group
of eight Internet access providers plans soon to form a
private network exchange company to win connection
rights with larger backbone players.

At a recent West Coast founders meeting, Electric
Lightwave Inc., Epoch Networks Inc., E.spire
Communications Inc., Exodus Communications Inc.,
Netcom On-Line Communication Services Inc., Savvis
Communications Corp., Williams Communications Group
and Winstar GoodNet agreed to pool $20 million to start
a corporation dedicated to connecting the members at
nine peering points around the U.S.

"There is a real crisis we need to solve in the backbone,"
said Mike Gaddis, chief technical officer of Savvis
(www.savvis.net).

The crux of the problem is high packet loss from
poor-quality interconnections between networks at the
public exchange points. Also, smaller networks are
unable to win free-traffic exchange, or peering, with large
players such as MCI Communications Corp., Sprint
Corp. and UUnet Technologies Inc. because they don't
pump enough traffic to qualify as equals.

The group of eight has agreed to peer privately among
themselves -- with some very small networks paying for
transit of data -- in order to guarantee clean handoffs.
The goal is zero packet loss and, if attained, would open
the door for service-level guarantees over multiple
networks. At present, access providers can guarantee
only the bits moving over their own pipes.

"It will mean better service quality to the end user," said
E.spire Vice President of Internet Product Management
Anurag Lal. "We're definitely going to stay [in the
group]."

The details of the new company, including its name,
have not been finalized. What has been agreed upon is
that the corporation will be responsible for hiring the
staff and managing the nine peering points
independently.

Shared lines will run over Asynchronous Transfer Mode
protocol. <??> Dedicated peering connections will be
protocol-independent.


"The company will not compete with its members. It will
only sell exchange services," said Gaddis, who added no
member will be allowed to own more than 20 percent of
the organization.

The group's strategy is to entice UUnet (www.uu.net)
into the company because it has critical mass for peering
and better connections than the rest of the Net. UUnet
Chief Executive Officer John Sidgmore is aware of the
effort and is even giving some advice. "He's given us
some great ideas. Sidgmore is very interested in an
equitable and fair solution to the backbone peering
problem, " Gaddis said.


Peering Players

E.spire Communications Inc.

Electric Lightwave Inc.

Epoch Networks Inc.

Exodus Communications Inc.

Netcom On-Line Communication Services Inc.

Savvis Communications Corp.

Williams Communications Group

WinStar GoodNet

<<Inter@ctive Week -- 08-14-98>>

[Copyright 1998, Ziff Wire]



To: djane who wrote (52227)8/18/1998 2:34:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 61433
 
SMARTMONEY VoIP article [ASND reference]
(via VoIP thread via IDTC thread)

SMARTMONEY DAILY SCREEN: The Talking Internet
By JOSHUA ALBERTSON
Dow Jones Newswires

SmartMoney Interactive
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--With all the talk about the convergence of voice and data, one would think that "chatting" on the Internet would involve more than sending email or
typing furiously in some Web chat room. Well, a group of service and equipment companies are betting that soon it will.

Welcome to the world of Internet Protocol (IP) telephony, where voice is just another
traveler on Internet networks.

Other than the tech-savvy early adopters in this country, most of the current market for IP telephony is international. And although there is the potential for growth in the U.S., most analysts say that the future is predominantly international as well.

David Smith of Technology Futures, a telecommunications research concern, believes that the international voice-over Internet Protocol market will grow from approximately $600 million today to $20 billion in 2003, while the domestic market will rise from $100
million to $4 billion.
That's because telephony is much more competitive domestically; witness the variety of
10 cent-per-minute phone plans flashing across your television screens.

But internationally, the market isn't as crowded with good rates, and companies offering Internet voice connections can do so at much lower prices. Internet telephony bypasses the access costs that apply to standard telephone calls over circuit-switched networks.
Voice is essentially compressed into packets of data and sent over the Internet through 'gateways" provided by the service companies.

As Smith's estimates suggest, the possibilities are vast. And analysts on Wall Street are getting excited, too. "The potential for IP telephony will be huge," says Ulric Weil of Friedman, Billings, Ramsey.

Of course, potential is the key word. "To pass judgment is difficult," says Weil.

Many of the major networking and telecom equipment companies, like Cisco (CSCO), Lucent (LU) and Ascend (ASND), are at the forefront of this movement, but we chose to focus on the service end for now, where some companies have begun to make
Internet telephony a reality,

Our research turned up several interesting players, including competitive local exchange
carrier Intermedia (ICIX), which we wrote about last month in our CLEC screen, and
Inter-Tel (INTL), which popped up last week on our tech values screen. We also came across PSINet (PSIX), a stalwart Internet service provider that recently unveiled plans to provide a suite of voice-over Internet Protocol services to its corporate customers. [using ASND equipment]

Although the product, PSIVoice, is still in the introductory phases, the company believes that it will parry favor with multinational corporations wishing to communicate between dispersed offices.


The trouble in screening this group is that in these early days of development nobody is
making much money from residential customers. And the major players in the corporate
market -- where Smith thinks the best opportunities lie -- have yet to realize any
significant gains either.

One company that has gotten its program running is Hackensack, N.J.-based IDT (IDTC).

IDT entered the Internet telephony market in 1996 with its Net2Phone product.
Net2Phone allows residential customers to use their PCs to call people using telephones
at the other end. The call is carried over the Internet until it reaches a Net2Phone switch
at its destination, thereby eliminating most long-distance carrying fees.

The company charges from 5 cents to 8 cents per minute for domestic calls and less than 10 cents to some international markets. It has also been busy partnering of late,
signing deals with Yahoo! (YHOO), Excite (XCIT) and IBM (IBM) to promote Net2Phone. The Excite collaboration, announced earlier this week, will expand the company's international presence by offering IP telephony services directly to Excite customers. The company currently gets about half of its IP telephony revenue from abroad.

Despite the marketing efforts, revenue from Net2Phone is still rather limited. The company grossed $2.8 million last quarter, approximately 3% of its total intake. But that
number is up from $0.8 million a year ago, and the company expects that Internet telephony revenue can account for 25% of total revenue within a year.

Michele Wolf of Bear Stearns isn't convinced that consumer Internet telephony will be a major revenue driver for the company going forward, but she admits that the company is well-positioned should the market explode.

"If the international market took off," she says, "' I think IDT is positioned to be a major player in it. If it runs, then they should be a market leader." Meanwhile, the company is
taking steps to diversify its portfolio. Launched earlier this summer, Project David is IDT's corporate entry into the IP telephony market and at rock bottom prices -- 3.5 cents per minute for domestic calls and about 10 cents for calls to certain markets in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East.

Basically, the rates are so low because the company installs gateways in the offices of its corporate customers that enable calls to be routed directly from private branch exchanges (PBX) onto IDT's IP network, which carries them to their destination.

There are plenty of hurdles going forward. Analysts worry that regulators will begin to limit the prices these companies can offer. IDT will also face its share of competition as it broadens its IP telephony offerings. Smith looks for all of the Internet backbone companies to join the fray, followed closely by companies providing cable Internet services. "By definition, the cable modems are always on line," he says. "That's going to be one of the places Smith also sees expanding services in areas where wireless local loops are being deployed.

But for now, IDT is leading the pack, and, according to at least one analyst, that will
count for a lot as the market develops. "In IP telephony, he who gets in the earliest
stands to make the most," says Weil. Nonetheless, it's still early to play IDT -- or any
company, for that matter -- as an IP telephony stock. But it would certainly be an
encouraging sign if the company makes good on its plans to gain a quarter of its revenue
from this segment.

In the meantime, a consensus of analysts expects the company to report earnings of 18
cents for the quarter that ended in July based on the strength of its traditional telephone
service and calling card businesses.

That will bring fiscal 1998 (ending in July) earning s to 53 cents per share, a significant
jump over last year's loss of 18 cents. And if analysts are correct, the company should
see earnings growth of 57% and 29% in 1999 and 2000. That means that the company
is trading at a price-to-earnings ratio -- 28, based on 1999 estimates -- well below its
projected growth rate.