SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Loring who wrote (16811)8/17/1998 9:59:00 PM
From: Phillip C. Lee  Respond to of 213182
 
<<The current Gilder Technology Report says that "in retail channels, non-Intel processor market share in desktop PCs rose from 6% in January, 1997 to 36% in January, 1998. For instance, AMD processor PCs accounted for 45% of sub-$1,000 sales. Thus, CPQ can claim its highest margins from their sub-$1,000 PC of all their lines because of cheaper components. The iMac, however, doesn't have the comparable advantage of cheaper components ...or does it? Anyone?>>

As long as Apple could keep iMac's margin up to 22%-25%, I'm not going
to dig into more details regarding whether or not Apple could obtain
cheaper components. Besides, that's part of company's confidential
data.

All we have to look into Apple vs. CPQ or DELL is their PE and
SP comparisons. If Apple was judged based on the fundamental data
like other stocks, then it should have been significantly higher than
the current price. We forgive analysts based on their excuses -
revenue growth and market share. However, we've gotten pretty good
chance this time that Apple is going to break analysts excuses based
on Jobs words (he expected to have revenue growth and market share
increase as soon as this quarter) yesterday.

Phil



To: Loring who wrote (16811)8/18/1998 11:18:00 AM
From: Doren  Respond to of 213182
 
Depends, G3s are smaller and cooler than any Wintel processors. Quite a bit so when compared to Intel processors, don't know how much when compared to AMD or others. Since the size determines how many processors they get off each silicon slice the G3s have the potential to be cheaper. I think the price of G3s will drop faster and still leave Motorola and IBM room for good profit margins.