Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (5334)	8/18/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11603

Chuca, I asked Dale about the variability in the assays reported. Statistically, I had a problem with one large value outside what should be a normal distribution. Dale said that the reason for variability was because of the small sample size for SFA. I asked why not then just use larger values. He said that they wanted to keep with sample sizes meaningful to conventional practice. He said that we will have an appreciation for sample size when a technical paper is posted to the Technical section of the Maxam webpage. Maybe a mining expert can comment? Mello? In any event, recovery is expected to be much larger than SFA as we have seen before in Maxam data. At least double IMO.