Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Stock Swap -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (15256)	8/18/1998 9:04:00 AM
From: SE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17305

If it is a pump and dump he will not like the reception he recieves on this thread...as it will be counter to his opinion. Oh well.... Live and learn... -Scott

To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (15256)	8/18/1998 8:21:00 PM
From: ~digs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17305

Patrick, glad you noticed my post on the DGIV thread. As you can see I am rather frustrated with the others whom have researched this stock emmensly and are not willing to share their DD anywhere but on their own close-knit thread. The attitude I have observed there can be described as follows: Longs on DGIV are content. They have gotten a bad rap and naysayers are abundant. Most have decided that they will wait for new interest to come to them, and are not willing to venture out to find it, due to any number of reasons. Jeff Micthell's response about "rocketeers" is just one of them. DGIV has filed an sb-10 and will be releasing the implications of it soon. Investors in DGIV have decided that they will simply wait for this announcement. Once newcomers arrive, they will gladly share there opinions/research with them, but as I said, these folks have a negative connotation surrounding them right now, and if they attempted to increase awareness on a thread such as this one, they will likely receive an attitude of close-mindedness, much like Jeff's. I personally disagree with this philosophy, especially since I have no association with the "rocketeers." What I have asked numerous times on the DGIV thread, with no response whatsoever, is for the little guys (those without a mis-construed reputation) to go out and share their research on DGIV, before the numbers come out, and while shares are still undervalued. My frustration stems from such peoples lack of proactiveness... I do not care to take on this task single-handedly. Ultimately Patrick, I figure that I doing myself a favor by informing others (research suggests that the best way to learn all aspects of an issue is to teach others about it yourself, allowing for new ideas/opinions from objective sources, while reinforcing/revising one's own personal beliefs). Not only that, but if DGIV is successful, I gain credibility, which is equally important. I'm sure Andrew Vance can agree here. So, enough about DGIV shareholders, if you would like to here about their technology and business plan, please let me know. I will only post if I'm welcomed, otherwise everyone just tunes out and we're left with nothing but a waste of time.