Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SG who wrote (9830)	8/18/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: GVTucker	Respond to of 11098

<<First they don't provide enough information, then you say they are providing enough for "sufficient information to make projections for the next 6 months." Now you end with more questions of doubt about this news release. You are starting to talk out of both sides of your mouth.>> Not at all. I clearly stated that the projection information was a positive. Forgive me for looking at information in an objective manner, seeing positive information when the news is good, and negative information when the news is bad. <<I believe this is the scenario, why would PRST sell its technology short.>> Probaby because PRST technology isn't worth as much as you think it is.

To: SG who wrote (9830)	8/18/1998 3:09:00 PM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11098

"I can't even begin to imagine the kind of on-going revenue stream that is associated with this contract. License agreements, equipment maintenance and more. What kind of products and development is going to take place when PRST combines this technology with Battelle's and they start to market these concepts to the waiting world." Scott, you words. BTW I prefer the free and open exchange of rational, factual ideas. I don't care for the self-centered approach that is used by some to lure the unsuspecting into overvalued stocks. A lot of people got burned on this stock in the past, not due to shorts but rather the overpromotion of the stock in the first place. I've read your posts defending the company and promoting their technology which is fine. The words of your most recent post are reminiscent of PRST's past problems with overpromotion of their stock.