Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1751)	8/18/1998 4:51:00 PM
From: j_b	Respond to of 13994

<<"the investigation is now under investigation". >> Having Clinton's people accuse Starr's people of leaking information, and having the justice department immediately leap on it seems sort of opportune. From the reporting that was going on at the time, it sounded just as likely that the White House was leaking the information, and they stood to gain far more. Clinton's side has spent most of their energy trying this case in the court of public opinion, so this would fit their MO. Of course, you may have already convicted Starr, and are not willing to give him the same benefit of the doubt you would want given to Clinton. Clinton has been proven by his own admission (on more than one occaision) to be a liar. Starr has proven to be a man of honor and conviction, which is what got him appointed to the Independent Counsel position in the first place. Why would you trust Clinton's version of events over Starr's?