Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RocketMan who wrote (22205)	8/18/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: Howard C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

"Can the financials be far behind?" Now there's a good question.

To: RocketMan who wrote (22205)	8/18/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: macker	Respond to of 50264

the short covering wont raise the price unless there is buying pressure with it, the short position is too large to cover in a few days though, the buying has been less then the sells today but not enough to help the mm's significantly, it is bullish because they wouldnt be covering for no reason, they know something is up. tic, tic, tic. macker

To: RocketMan who wrote (22205)	8/18/1998 3:36:00 PM
From: Mike Ankley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

I have a question regarding termination points for which I have been unable to find an answer elsewhere. Is 1 termination point per country sufficient to handle all VoIP traffic coming into any country? For example, Digitcom currently has the 1 US termination point in LA. I believe Mark C. pointed out that traffic from across the Atlantic would probably necessitate some East Coast city termination points. Are multiple termination points per country necessary? Would they optimize the calling volume throughput of the VoIP network? Would multiple termination points add any significant technical problems for DGIV, or would potential network trafficing problems outweigh those? Just curious. Mike