SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ken Salaets who wrote (1972)8/18/1998 5:41:00 PM
From: Stanley L Brown  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4634
 
Ken,

You another TAVA crybaby? So let me get this straight? We can't have and share an opinion of a stock here? It appears that's all he (Bill) has done so far. And I might add a opinion backed up with a lot of research and common sense. It was those and those reasons only that TAVA is where it is now. Come on now, you really think Bill has the power to move the market? Sheesh I'll bet you a share a TAVA right here and now with the board as my witness that Bill will never see the inside of a courtroom over this! To many Speech Freedom groups willing to jump on this one! He hasn't said a thing that the company can prove is untrue so ....

Happy Trading

Stan



To: Ken Salaets who wrote (1972)8/18/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4634
 
Ken, I absolutely do believe it. I am initiating a short position within the next few days in TAVA because of this.

It is not appropriate to try to silence someone from posting their opinions on an opinion board by the use of inappropriate litigation. If TAVA takes Bill to court, then it shows that they are more concerned with selling stock to the gullible, than providing embedded Y2K solutions.

I would encourage Bill or anyone sued by a company for their postings to countersue for malicious prosecution. The only people who have a problem with the extensive pecedential case law supporting freedom of the press in this country are people like you, who can't accept that TAVA sold off because it was overpriced. You are clinging to a fantasy that what Bill has done will result in any sanction against him, unless the company is willing to outspend him. But just because a deep pocketed corporation decides to be a bully. It sure won't result in any kind of precedent that will be quoted in the future.

If TAVA was really going to do what they say, then they'd shut Bill up by executing thier business plan. You should be ashamed of yourself for saying that it is appropriate for them to take him to court. That statement is a slap in the face of the Bill of Rights.

I also notice that you haven't had the nerve to show your face hear while TAVA was falling. You used to come here and try to tell us that Bill was wrong about TAVA. Now that he's been proven right, you show up wanting to sue. But only after a convenient price jump.

And will you please have the decency not to call me Babs?

Barb



To: Ken Salaets who wrote (1972)8/18/1998 6:06:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4634
 
Another TAVA crybaby trying to scare poor old Bill Wexler.

Ken, you are simply another pathetic idiot who can't get over the fact that I was and continue to be 100% correct about the TAVA stock promotion fraud.

Do you honestly believe that all this crosstalk about TAVA suing me (BTW - a rumor which is false - just like all the other false claims made by TAVA shills) scares me?

Let me restate this for the record:

****TAVA stock has been fraudulently promoted. TAVA has no valuable/unique technology and its fundamentals simply will not support its grossly overinflated stock price.

TAVA will eventually trade below 1 a share.*********

Unlike the TAVA fraud victims, I actually bothered to do my homework and dig a little deeper than reading a hot stock tip from a bogus internet newsletter. This is exactly why I now have the money and people like you have to resort to making yourselves look like asses by issuing empty threats.