Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (1824)	8/19/1998 11:15:00 AM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<< Because he's appearing voluntarily, not under a subpoena (which was withdrawn), it's not clear that there is any court order which he would be violating>> I love that expression - voluntarily. It just doesn't seem right that this testimony could be called voluntary. However, I heard a talking head say the same thing last night. Thanks for the correction. Funny thing - if I volunteer to be a witness in a criminal case, and I refuse to answer a question put to me by one of the attorneys, I guarantee the judge will give me the choice of answering or being found in contempt. I don't believe the presence or lack of a subpoena would matter.