SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Doughboy who wrote (1826)8/18/1998 5:57:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13994
 
The big problem with your analysis is that it really doesn't matter what the American people say to Judge Starr or what they think they are "fed up with". We have a legal process with which Clinton will have to comply.....He may refuse a subpoena, but if he does, the courts will decide if he is in contempt, not the American people. Pundits having a "field day" with Starr haven't prevented him from carrying out his mandate thus far......bp



To: Doughboy who wrote (1826)8/18/1998 6:27:00 PM
From: mauser96  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Unlike most of the other players in this game, Starr isn't running for a political office, and he can do what he wants, as long as it's legal, and to hell with the biased media. When it gets to Congress, that's another matter.
Good analysis.
If Clinton ever took the fifth, it would fly legally, but the public aren't lawyers and they would see it as an admission of guilt. His own party would disown him.