Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Salaets who wrote (1982)	8/18/1998 6:58:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4634

I see you want nothing more than to argue. It has nothing to do with the gov't that I believe TAVA is more concerned with selling stock to the gullible, than providing embedded Y2K solutions. I don't see how you can make the quantum leap to equate that in any manner with the Libertarians. Further, you have continued to call me Babs, despite my polite requests that you do not do so. These are examples of an immature and unfocused mind at work. Of course you may continue to post your idiotic and juvenile opinions, and whine for court action because you are not a capable stock picker and have lost money on TAVA. This is very much a matter of Freedom of the Press. You may think that thios is something new, but this case law has been decided for decades. It is not "virgin" territory. What gov'ts outside the US are thinking makes no difference. Don't assume that I think the 'net is a US thing either, but a US poster, posting his opinions about a stock that trades on a US market is by it's nature limited to US law. Anonymity is also not an issue when it comes to freedom of the press. You may think you've "rained on my parade" but you are mistaken. Come to think about it, there is very little in your diatribes that you have gotten correct. Barb