Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CDMQ who wrote (13924)	8/18/1998 10:14:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik	Respond to of 152472

Re : the Forbes response to you : arrrgh ! (And, I am (or was) a huge fan of Forbes). (I have been a subscriber continuously since 1976; and actually spend a lot of time reading each issue). I don't know what is going on with this article. I'm going to try to pursue this thing a little more. (I know I probably will not accomplish much, if anything). Jon.

To: CDMQ who wrote (13924)	8/19/1998 12:40:00 AM
From: Bux	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Why does this have a familiar ring to it? I received it in my box today. Dear Mr. Mullen: Thank you for your letter. We feel that we have reported the facts accurately. You are, of course, free to draw different conclusions from them, and we always appreciate it when readers take the time to share their views with us. Thanks again and we hope you continue to enjoy the Forbes Digital Tool. Editorial Department Forbes Digital Tool -----Original Message----- From: Michael Mullen To: letters@forbesdigital.com <letters@forbesdigital.com> Date: Monday, August 17, 1998 11:05 PM Subject: Regarding article on cellular standards battle.