Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (62774)	8/19/1998 12:50:00 PM
From: gnuman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul E. re; <It's another stick you could swing, along with your "AMD/Cyrix sub $1000 PCs are gonna kill Intel".> First of all, I don't own any AMD stock, you do. Appears to be a smart move on your part. ;-) Doubt if either of us have NSM, a real dog. I feel sorry for Brian, smart guy but maybe he should have stayed at LSI. My Intel shares move up and down the same percent as your's, (wish I held as much as you). You continue to be upset when I point out competitive factors in the marketplace. I think iMac could impact the segment-0 market. Cheap, easy to use by the PC illiterates, and tailored to the net. Will the WinTel faction need to react? Is it a big deal? I don't know, but considering where real growth is happening things like these may have inordinate impact on the future. I've said a number of times I think Intel will be a $50 Billion company within five years. Do you disagree? But I'm not sure of the product mix that will generate these revenues. Too many segment-0's, graphics chips, StrongArms, and other appliance parts could change the business profile substantially. Anyway, I'll keep pointing out the competitive factors, you keep deriding them. Add's a little balance.