Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marvin smith who wrote (9959)	8/19/1998 12:26:00 PM
From: David	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26039

Marvin, I think there are other threads for this kind of debate.

To: marvin smith who wrote (9959)	8/19/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: art slott	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26039

Marvin, that still has to be proved. He was stupid for not admitting it right away. It is still not what the founding fathers had in mind when they were speaking of high crimes. Imagine T. Jefferson being hounded by Starr. Having had a child from a slave mistress. It has been stated infinitum ( by legal analysts) that no prosecuter would have ever charged anyone with perjury stemming from a civil case thats been thrown out. Its like charging someone in divorce court with perjury. It doesn't happen. Now if you want to make some $ imo post.messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com Regards, Art